10-21-2001
SCRIPTURE READING: Genesis 1:1, 31
I. From whence is
life?
We’ll introduce our topic by looking
at just three prominent explanations:
1) Theory of Evolution:
Ref. Weather & Climate Geography, evolution of Earth’s atmosphere.
During the Precambrian Era, roughly
3.8 billion-545 million years ago, the atmosphere still has no oxygen in
major amounts, but it DOES have water vapor. This rain picks up atmosphere’s
carbon dioxide, which it has in abundance at this time, and brings it down
to the oceans. The oceans, now full of carbon dioxide, corrode Earth’s
surface and introduce silicon and other elements in the process. This builds
the sea floor. Evidence for this, they say, is in the limestone beds of
rock we can now witness in caves. Meanwhile, all this carbon dioxide and
water vapor has gone to Earth’s surface, leaving the Precambrian atmosphere’s
only other major element: nitrogen. They say this is evidenced by the fact
that 78% of our modern-day atmosphere is nitrogen—it got left behind by
carbon dioxide and water vapor.
At this point, single-celled life
is possible, using methane, ammonia, carbon dioxide, water vapor, and electricity
of some kind (lightning). From this, amino acids can form—they proudly
remind us that it has been done in a lab, by a fellow named Miller. So
it was laid out this way by my professor: methane + ammonia + CO2 + H20
+ electricity + TIME = "Let there be life!" The irony of this did not escape
me; in the process of directly contradicting the sacred text, she makes
a play on words from a quote made by GOD. Also, it’s ironic to observe
that this creation of amino acids in a lab—one of their strongest pieces
of evidence—came about by manipulation from an intelligent being: Dr. Miller.
2) Creation
Account: Why not a "Theory of Creation"?
It’s not scientific. What we have
here are two different forms of evidence: scientific, and historical. Scientific
evidence is produced through observation and experimentation. In this,
it is limited. For example: oddly enough, science cannot observe or experiment
on the origin of life or the atmosphere. The Bible is a document, a piece
of historical evidence. Miracles are established by historic evidence,
the resurrection of Christ; this evidence must be disproved by critics—they
simply ignore it. The Bible is supported by eye-witness accounts and reliable
historic documents.
READ GENESIS 1
3) Day-Age Theory,
and Apologetic Theory:
Suggests the days of Genesis 1
were not literal, 24-hour days, but rather lengthy periods, thousands and
thousands of years. Most of the arguments in support of this theory come
from evolutionary science and geology—they insist you cannot reconcile
a literal 6-day creation with the geological strata of rock that we can
observe. There are a few argument made from the text of the Bible, and
we’ll look at those in just a moment.
Having briefly reviewed these
three, let’s look at determining factor, the Creator of life, in each:
Evolution: methane + ammonia
+ CO2 + H20 + electricity + TIME = LIFE
Evolution relies on faith in the god of
Time, if you will. It is nontheistic, but it relies on no less faith.
Professor George Wald, of Harvard
Univ., 1954, in his article on "The Origin of Life":
"However improbable we regard
this event, or any of the steps it involves, given enough time, it will
almost certainly happen at least once. And for life as we know it, with
its capability for growth and reproduction, once may be enough. Time is
the hero of the plot . . . Given so much time, the impossible becomes possible,
the possible becomes probable, and the probable becomes virtually certain.
One has only to wait, time itself performs the miracles."
Dr. Robert Jastrow, in 1980, said:
"The key to Darwin’s explanation is time, and the passage of many centuries."
Creation Account: God is
named 33 times in the 31 verses of Genesis 1. Each time, attached is a
verb describing what God did: He created, He said, He saw, He blessed.
GOD is the Creator of Life.
Consequently, we look at . . .
Day-Age Theory: The Creator
of Life is GOD . . . and Time. God alone did not do it, but rather He needed
a certain amount of time for things to take their course. If those who
support this theory don’t see it exactly this way, the evolutionists they
are catering to DO.
Our focus will be upon addressing this
issue, the debate between the Day-Age Theorists and the New Earth Theorists—that’s
the name given to those who believe in a literal, 6-day creation. It’s
important that we understand the implications behind this debate, brethren,
because there are Christians preaching and teaching at our "sound" school
in Florida and among groups of God-fearing brethren; churches that we visit
when we’re traveling.
What I intend to establish today is the
implication behind the Day-Age Theory, and any other Apologetic Theory
of Theistic Evolution. Brethren may not initially realize the implications
behind accepting Genesis 1 & 2 as literal, or as a poetic allegory
of the passage of many ages.
We’ll address first just a few
of the arguments that support the Day-Age Theory. As I said before, most
arguments are based on scientific theory. Today we’ll concern ourselves
only with arguments made from Scripture.
One of the only arguments made
from the context is that on the sixth day described in Genesis 2, way too
much happened for it to have been a literal day. How could Adam have fulfilled
the enormous task of naming these creatures, then be presented with woman
and say, (2:23) "This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh .
. . ." The word "now," they say in this context, is equivalent to "at last,"
which would indicate he’d been waiting more than a few hours for woman
to come along. They’d like to draw this out to a period of months, if not
years. The first part of this is based on the assumption that man named
EVERY creeping thing and fish of the sea AS WELL AS the creatures of air
and land mentioned. They say with no prior human observation, it would
have been an enormous task to document all that. He’s literally starting
at square one, here. Firstly, Adam named the creatures brought before Him
by God, not necessarily every one.
Secondly, they assume that without
prior human knowledge, Adam would’ve had a real hard time of this task.
They forget that on the day he was created, Adam walked, talked, knew how
to cultivate the ground. He was a creature "of God." Compare this situation
to one in the New Testament. How long did it take Paul to learn the gospel?
Sure, it takes us hours. It was endowed upon him!
They secondly assume that Adam’s
statement: "This is NOW bone of my bones, flesh of my flesh," was a statement
made by man who’d been a lonely bachelor. In fact, the Hebrew text indicates
nothing more than that he was making reference to the things that had followed
before this event. Here, he’s gone through these creatures, male-female,
male-female, male-female . . . "NOW this is bone of MY bones . . ."
The support you’ll find most commonly argued
is the use of the Hebrew word for "day"—yom. Well, first, as honest
people having just read the text, what does it indicate to you? "Evening
and morning . . . a first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth day." Simply
enough, if Moses had intended to convey a long period of time, the Hebrew
language has better words for it than yom.
Usage of yom
1. Day, opposite of night. "Daylight."
2. Day, of 24 hours. "Working day," with
evening and morning, "snowy day," "your day has come," Sabbath Day.
3. Day of Yahweh. The time of coming judgment.
4. Days of life. Lifespan: "Advanced in
days."
5. Days, plural. "Seven days," "many days,"
"days of old."
6. Days, plural, in past reference to months
or years. "Those were the days."
7. Dual, such as in the expression, "a
day or two."
8. With the article, "that day."
9. With a preposition such as bet
(Heb.). "On that day," or "when."
Moses was clearly capable of better communicating
an age or period of time. His use of yom as a literal day must be
what he was intending to communicate.
As such, he drew an important comparison:
Exodus 20:8-11: Here Moses compares
the six literal days of the week leading to Sabbath—the same period of
time it took God to create the world.
Day-Age supporters respond to this argument
with:
Hebrews 4:3-9: Here is the Hebrews
writer’s admonition that we enter into God’s rest. Here, in v.9: is that
Sabbath rest a 24-hour period? No, it’s eternity! A much longer length
of time than is named! You’ll notice there are two uses of the word in
this passage. He presents a historical illustration, v.3-4, and in v.5,
his transition, "and again . . ." He’s leading to his illustration. Notice
also that v.9, the Sabbath is not called a day, but a "rest." In Exodus,
Moses is comparing weeks. In Hebrews, the writer is comparing RESTS.
But there are many brethren who resolve
this issue by not resolving it at all. They say, "Y’know, there are good
arguments on both sides, this should be considered an open matter." Brethren,
if Creation is a poetic allegory, GOD is a poetic allegory.
We will consider passages of Scripture
that mention Creation. What we will find is that the Creation account is
used as EVIDENCE to support the glory of God, the Maker of the Law, the
Deity of Christ, the nature of man, and our obligation to God and His law.
Would the Holy Spirit use as evidence an allegory or a record of historical
occurrences?
II. The importance
of creation.
A) Creation,
as we’ve read, is used in the Bible to explain the origin of the universe.
I’d refer you also to these verses:
Psalm 33:9: For He spoke,
and it was done; He commanded, and it stood fast.
Did it change over time? No, it "stood
fast."
Psalm 148:5: Let them praise
the name of the Lord, for He commanded and they were created.
Exodus 31:17: "It is a sign between
Me and the sons of Israel forever; for in six days the Lord made heaven
and earth, but on the seventh day He ceased from labor, and was refreshed."
B) Creation is used in the Bible to
identify the God we serve.
Isaiah 40:12-31
v.12-14, 21-22—notice here, v.22, my translation
reads "vault of the Earth;" those of you with King James will read "circle,"
a word not used by science to describe Earth until the late 1400s.
God here is identified as the God of Creation.
Psalm 8:3: "When I consider Thy
heavens, the work of Thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which Thou hast
ordained;"
The realm of the universe is identified
as God’s, and did it take a colossal effort on His part? No, it was the
work of His fingers! The power of God indicated here agrees with Moses
account that it only took Him six Earth days to do!
Genesis 1 is constantly referenced to indicate
WHO GOD IS. Poetic allegory or historical account? God’s glory and power
rests on a historical account.
C) Creation identifies the God of Creation
as the God of Revelation.
Psalm 19
v.3—the Earth is testifying the glory of
God
v.4-6—His Creation is described as a strong,
vigorous bridegroom; power and glory shown here.
Read on . . .
v.7-8—That’s strange—why the sudden change
of subject? V.1-6 is making testimony to the Law’s Maker—it’s creation
is as miraculous as the first creation described, and from the same Source.
II Corinthians 4:6: [Here the apostles
have had the Word revealed to them]
For God, who said, "Light shall shine
out of darkness," is the One who has shone in our hearts to give the light
of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Christ.
This Law has come from the God of Creation.
If God’s evidence of glory is a fable, then His law is of little consequence
to us. It, too, would be supported by fable.
D) Creation reveals the deity of Christ.
John 1:1-3: v.1-2—In
the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was
God. He was in the beginning with God.
Also in John, in Christ’s prayer in ch.17,
Christ reveals:
John 17:24: "Father, I desire
that they also, whom Thou hast given Me, be with Me where I am, in order
that they may behold My glory, which Thou hast given Me; for Thou didst
love Me before the foundation of the world."
Hebrews 1:1-3: v.3—And He is
the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and
upholds all things by the word of His power . . . Christ upholds all
things in the word of His power—creation included, used to illustrate God’s
power
Colossians 1:14-20
v.15-17—And He is the image of the invisible
God, the first-born of all creation.
For by Him all things were created,
both in the heavens and on the earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones
or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things have been created by Him
and for Him.
And He is before all things, and in
Him all things hold together.
2:9: For in Him all the fullness
of Deity dwells in bodily form.
If the process described was not a miracle,
then Christ is not miraculous.
E) Creation shows God to be worthy
of worship.
Revelation 4:11: [This
passage is described as the Throne Scene.]
"Worthy art Thou, our Lord and our God,
to receive glory and honor and power; [WHY?] For Thou didst create
all things, and because of Thy will they existed, and were created."
14:7: . . . and he said with
a loud voice, "Fear God, and give Him glory, because the hour of His judgment
has come; and worship Him who made the heaven and the earth and sea and
springs of waters."
F) Creation establishes the nature
of man.
Matthew 19:4--created "from
the beginning," not down the evolutionary process; man was created distinct
from the animals in intelligence, speech, skill, and dominion; we are the
only creatures created moral—a dog cannot be guilty of fornication or adultery,
but v.9 shows a man CAN
So, according to the Theistic Evolutionists,
when did Adam and Eve come along? What kind of pre-man were they? Neanderthal
perhaps? Or were they simply the first monkeys capable of discerning right
from wrong?
Genesis 1:26-27: Man and woman created
"In His own image," the likeness of God. But there’s more to it than simply
physical appearance.
Psalm 8:3-5: Man is glorified. When
God created Adam, he was pure, without blemish, holy.
Ephesians 4:24: . . . and put
on the new self, which in the likeness of God has been created in righteousness
and holiness of the truth.
Colossians 3:10: [the obedient]
. . . have put on the new self who is being renewed to a true knowledge
according to the image of the One who created him—
v.11 describes this as a RENEWAL—we once
again become what Adam was created as—a righteous being.
The fact that we require a RENEWAL further
implies another thing the Creation shows...
G) Creation reveals man’s moral responsibility.
Acts 17:24-31: v.24—God
is LORD, He performs independent of man’s manipulation, it is He who sets
limits and, v.30, we are obligated to respond to Him. And how did he begin
this appeal? How did he describe God to these ignorant, idolatrous men?
He is "the God who made the world and all things in it!" HE is LORD, HE
sets limits, and we are obliged to respond to HIM.
Is the Creation account poetic allegory,
or historical fact? If the Creation described of THIS God, here and throughout
Holy Scripture, is fable—THEN WE HAVE NO MORAL RESPONSIBILITY!! Because
His glory, His law, His Son who died for us, is all based on false evidence.
This is no trifling matter, brethren.
The foundation of the world is the foundation of the Bible.
I’ll close with one more passage . . .
I Timothy 6:13-14: I
charge you in the presence of God, who gives life to all things, and of
Christ Jesus, who testified the good confession before Pontius Pilate,
that you keep the commandment without stain or reproach until the appearing
of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Those men on Mars Hill that Paul preached
two knew NOTHING of God—but that He was Lord, and He called for them to
repent. When Peter preached Christ to the crowd on Pentecost, all they
knew was that Jesus Christ was indeed the Son of God, and that they were
sinners, and they had to repent and be baptized. The Ethiopian Eunuch read
one chapter of Isaiah, and from that passage, Philip revealed his need
to be baptized.
If you get anything from this lesson, get
this: God, who created the world and all therein in six days, requires
your obedience. His Son, who created the world and all therein in six days,
died a mortal death for you.
Repent, confess your belief in Christ,
and be baptized.
|